Name
UOP HgSIV
Owner
/ UOP LLC
Brand
UOP HgSIV™
Process
Gas processing
Type
Mercury Removal Unit
Available
Insight Articles
#TE403

Description

Process Overview

UOP HgSIV™ Regenerable Mercury Removal is a proprietary Honeywell UOP licensed technology in which silver-impregnated molecular sieve (HgSIV™) adsorbent is loaded into an existing TSA (Temperature Swing Adsorption) molecular sieve dehydrator. Dehydration and mercury removal are performed simultaneously in the same vessels. Mercury is adsorbed during the online (drying) step and thermally desorbed during the normal regeneration cycle, so the sorbent is continuously refreshed each cycle. The technology can be applied to both gas and liquid hydrocarbon streams.


MRU Placement Options

Before configuring the unit, the placement within the gas plant must be selected. Four options are recognised, in order of preference:

  1. Upstream of amine and dehydration units — most recommended; maximises total plant protection by preventing mercury migration to any downstream asset; requires separate MRU vessels (GB non-regenerable type); mercury is permanently retained upstream
  2. Inside the dryers (HgSIV™) — no new vessels or piping; mercury removal integrated into existing dehydrator; cold box fully protected; mercury exits with regen gas
  3. Inside the dryers + regen gas treatment — HgSIV™ in dehydrators combined with a small downstream GB guard bed on the regen gas loop; fully mercury-free product and regen gas recycle
  4. Downstream of the dehydrators — least preferred; cold box is protected but mercury remains in the acid gas system and mol sieve regen gas; adds pressure drop; forced choice when using moisture-sensitive activated carbon sorbents

Step-by-Step Process Description

Step 1 — Feed Gas Entry (shared with dehydration unit)

  • Wet feed gas (containing both water vapour and mercury) enters the molecular sieve dehydration unit, passing first through the existing feed gas separator
  • Typical operating conditions: 70°F (21°C)845 psig (~58 barg), water-saturated feed​
  • No dedicated inlet separation stage is added beyond what exists in the standard dehydration unit feed system

Step 2 — Simultaneous Adsorption of Water and Mercury (Online Vessel)

  • Gas passes downward through the adsorber vessel loaded with a blend of:
    • Standard 4A molecular sieve (MOLSIV™) for water adsorption​
    • HgSIV™ adsorbent for mercury adsorption
  • HgSIV™ is a molecular sieve product with silver on the outer surface of the pellet or bead, where it is readily available to form an amalgam with mercury, providing a rapid rate of mercury removal:
    • Hg⁰ + Ag → Ag/Hg amalgam (at adsorption temperature)
  • HgSIV™ is loaded as a partial replacement of standard dehydration sieve — the bed size does not need to be increased, because mercury sorption sites are separate from and additive to water sorption sites​
  • Available in beaded and pelletised forms; loaded identically to conventional molecular sieves — no nitrogen blanketing required during installation or unloading​
  • Adsorption cycle follows the standard TSA dehydration cycle of the host dryer (specific cycle duration not stated in source documents)
  • Outlet mercury target: ≤ 0.01 µg/Nm³ (< 1 ppt by volume)​

Step 3 — Thermal Regeneration (Offline Vessel)

  • When the online vessel switches offline, hot dry regeneration gas — typically a small slip stream of plant residue gas — is passed upward through the bed​
  • The mercury desorption profile is similar to the water regeneration profile, except that mercury is completely removed from the HgSIV™ adsorbent well before the full regeneration temperature for water removal is reached
  • Regeneration uses conventional TSA dryer regeneration temperatures — the same heating programme as standard molecular sieve dehydration; no special temperature modifications to the existing regeneration cycle are required​
  • Because mercury removal sites are regenerated each cycle with a clean gas stream, the sorbent is refreshed each cycle and retains a high and stable rate of mercury removal over the full sieve life

Step 4 — Spent Regeneration Gas Handling

The spent regeneration gas carries desorbed mercury vapour. Three handling options are available:

Option A — No treatment (dilution to sales gas or fuel gas)

  • Spent regen gas is cooled in a knockout drum, where bulk water is condensed and removed
  • The remaining gas (containing mercury at ~39 µg/Nm³ average for a 2.5 µg/Nm³ feed case) is routed to the fuel gas header or blended into the sales gas line
  • At these dilution ratios, mercury concentration in the blended stream approaches feed gas levels
  • This is the most common choice in practice — no operating plants have opted for regen gas treatment as of the date of available references​

Option B — GB guard bed on regen gas (treatment + recycle)

  • Spent regen gas (after cooling and knockout separator) is routed through a small non-regenerable GB adsorbent bed
  • Only a small bed is required: regen gas volume is much smaller than feed gas volume; mercury need only be reduced to feed gas concentration (not to product specification), so the bed can be loaded to higher breakthrough before replacement​
  • Treated regen gas is then recycled to the feed gas or sales gas without mercury concern

Option C — Liquid mercury recovery by condensation (high Hg feeds)

  • At high feed mercury levels (~40 µg/Nm³ and above), mercury in the regen gas condenses in the knockout drum at a saturation concentration of ~1,100 µg/Nm³
  • Liquid metallic mercury accumulates at the bottom of the separator and is decanted and recovered as pure liquid mercury — a saleable product
  • Less than 0.5% of inlet mercury reports to the condensed water phase (mercury solubility in oxygen-free water ~25 ppbw)

Step 5 — Cooling and Re-pressurisation

  • After regeneration, the vessel is cooled with cool dry gas before switching back online
  • Standard TSA switching sequence: adsorption → heating → cooling → standby/online

Step 6 — Outlet Filtration

  • Product gas exits through outlet particle filters (2×100%)
  • Outlet mercury specification confirmed: ≤ 0.01 µg/Nm³

 


Equipment List

Item Type / Specification
Molecular sieve adsorber vessels (×2 or ×3) Existing TSA dehydrator vessels; HgSIV™ loaded as partial bed replacement; no resizing required
HgSIV™ adsorbent Silver on outer surface of molecular sieve pellet/bead; beaded or pelletised; UOP proprietary
Standard MOLSIV™ 4A sieve Water adsorption layer; retained alongside HgSIV™
Regeneration gas heater Electric or fired; heats regen gas to standard TSA temperature
Spent regen gas cooler / KO drum Cools regen gas; condenses water; condensed liquid Hg recovery at high Hg feeds
GB guard bed (Option B only) Small non-regenerable GB adsorbent vessel on regen gas loop
TSA cycle controller UOP-designed switching / sequence controller (licensed)
Outlet particle filters 2×100%
Mercury analyser On product gas outlet; CVAFS type recommended for field measurement to 0.01 µg/Nm³ ​

Mercury Material Balance — Reference Case

For a 545 MMSCFD plant, feed at 70°F / 845 psig, feed Hg = 2.5 µg/Nm³:​

Stream Mercury Load
Feed gas total Hg 34.6 g/day
Product dry gas (Hg-free) < 0.01 µg/Nm³
Condensed water from KO drum < 0.5% of inlet (< 0.154 g/day)
Regen gas to fuel/sales (Option A) ~34.45 g/day at avg. 39.4 µg/Nm³
Regen gas volume 34.4 MMSCFD (6.3% of feed)

Performance & Efficiency

  • Outlet mercury: ≤ 0.01 µg/Nm³ routinely achieved — equal to or better than non-regenerable systems​
  • Silver sites remain active over full sieve life (3–5 years, same as standard dehydration sieve lifetime); no periodic sorbent change-out for mercury loading​
  • Bed size unchanged vs. standard dehydration design; no additional pressure drop vs. a standalone dehydration unit
  • Effective primarily for elemental mercury (dominant form in natural gas); some ionic and organic forms may also be captured​
  • Spent HgSIV™, when properly regenerated prior to unloading, passes the EPA TCLP test and qualifies as non-hazardous waste for disposal — a significant advantage over non-regenerable sorbents​

Economics

  • No additional adsorption vessels required vs. a plant already designed with a TSA dehydrator — major CAPEX saving​
  • OPEX components:
    • Regeneration gas fuel (shared with dehydration, no incremental cost)
    • Optional: GB guard bed sorbent replacement (small volume, infrequent)
    • Optional: liquid mercury handling/sales at high Hg feed cases
  • Sorbent cost: HgSIV™ replaces only a portion of standard molecular sieve; incremental sorbent cost vs. standard dehydration is modest
  • Honeywell UOP process license fee and proprietary sorbent supply apply
  • Most cost-effective for new LNG or cryogenic NGL plants where a TSA dehydrator is already in the design basis; retrofit to existing dehydrators is also feasible as a drop-in with no civil or mechanical modifications
  • Eliminates spent hazardous sorbent disposal costs associated with non-regenerable systems

Deployments

At the time of the earlier referenced UOP technical paper (Corvini et al.), HgSIV™ had been installed in over 25 gas dryers and 7 liquid dryers globally, with installations in the Far East, Middle East, Africa, South America, and the United States. 

Reference plant — PTT GSP-5, Thailand (gas phase):​

  • Feed rate: 265 MMSCFD per vessel; pressure: 48 kg/cm²; temperature: 18°C
  • Feed Hg: 300 µg/Nm³; outlet Hg: < 0.01 µg/Nm³ from start-up
  • Design bed life: 4 years; replaced sulphur-impregnated carbon predecessor

Reference plant — PTT GSP-4, Thailand (liquid phase):​

  • Feed: natural gas condensate; flow rate: 6,962 kg/h; pressure: 31 barg; temperature: 12°C
  • Feed Hg: 2,000 ppbw; outlet Hg: < 1 ppbw; also removing H₂S and AsH₃

The technology is the preferred choice for LNG pretreatment trains in SE Asia and the Middle East, where both elevated mercury levels and brazed aluminium cryogenic heat exchangers are present.


References

  1. Corvini, G., Stiltner J. & Clark K. MERCURY REMOVALFROM NATURAL GAS AND LIQUID STREAMS (Document version: Feb 26, 2008)
  2. Eckersley N., UOP LLC (May 9, 2013). Advanced Mercury Removal Technologies. Presented at GPAC 2013, Calgary, AB, Canada
  3. Mishra S., UOP (Q1, 2014). Mercury treatment options for natural gas plants. PTQ
  4. UOP. UOP Mercury Removal for Natural Gas Production Brochure (Document version: Mar 5, 2020)

Insight Articles
Your insights will be shown here

Title Date
Technology Unit
Content provided by
Transaction Name Date
Modified by UserPic   Kokel, Nicolas 3/22/2026 8:21 PM
Added by UserPic   Kokel, Nicolas 3/22/2026 4:41 PM